Hello,

Uwe Schuster wrote:

> I don't think that this comparison does work here

.... because?
Every rewrite costs a lot of time and causes an endless plethora of new
bugs and incompatibilities. Rewriting a large and important piece of
software just for the fun of it is commercial suicide.

> and BTW, doesn't use VStudio 2010 WPF

Yes.

> which is .NET

Which is one of the libraries provided for the .NET framework. WPF
being slow doesn't disqualify .NET.

> and VS2010 has been delayed, because of the slowness of WPF?

I don't know about WPF (or about VS 2010), but on a related note, I
know that WinForms is often considered slow. The reason is that
WinForms uses GDI+ for graphics, a pretty native library which is
dog-slow due to lack of hardware acceleration.


-- 
Moritz


"Hey, it compiles! Ship it!"