Paul Scott wrote:

> >> ... most suggestions seem to be dismissed because they come from
> >> people who "think they know better how to run the company than the
> >> people who actually run it"
> > 
> > That's blatant nonsense. Micheal Rozlog didn't say something like
> > that, but I did. And I said that about people who try to tell
> > Embarcadero how to run their business.
> 
> Rudy,
> 
> I know that since you are contractually obliged to reply to each and
> every single message in these forums, you don't have much time left
> over to properly read the messages you're responding to <g>

Funny.

> but I did not say that Michael had been the source of that expression.

No, but you implied that you would get something like that back, from
him or from someone else from Embarcadero.
 

> to suggestions...

Thee is not a lot of evidence that they aren't either. Unless you know
all suggestions made to them, you can hardly tell if that is so.


AFAICT (and I do have a little more insight into their internal
processes than you do, I guess), they are and have been open to
suggestions. That does not mean they can follow any whim someone might
have. There very likely other factors (which we can only guess at) that
play an important role in their decision process too. These possible
factors have been discussed oh so many times already, over and over and
over.
-- 
Rudy Velthuis (TeamB)        http://www.teamb.com


"Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
 -- Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon on why his works on 
    celestial mechanics make no mention of God.