> Allen Bauer wrote:
> 
> > Paul Scott wrote:
> > 
> > > b. following up QC reports rather than passively sitting back
> > > waiting for user input.
> > 
> > I know, personally, that we do follow up on many QC reports and have
> > them brought to our attention all the time. I also know that the
> > team managers spend a large portion of time mining QC. Every entry
> > has to be triaged, which means that some will continue to sit. If
> > every report were the highest priority, then none of them are.
> 
> When I compare the situation today with the situation three years ago
> I think it got much better when speaking about the "Reported" reports
> and the reports that got opened or otherwise handled. Takahashi-san is
> doing a good job and most of the reports get opened very fast.
> 
> > That being said, if there are specific ones you feel have been
> > overlooked, please bring them up here. One or more of the highly
> > capable QC admins can look at those reports and ensure they're ready
> > for internal consumption.
> 
> The best is to post in the QC newsgroup
> 
> embarcadero.public.developernetwork.qualitycentral
> 
> Developer Network\QualityCentral
> https://forums.embarcadero.com/forum.jspa?forumID=9