"Andrue Cope [TeamB]" <no.spam@not.a.valid.address> wrote:

>
> something they'd rather not do. One possible issue is that those
> agencies try to avoid being seen as endorsing any single product. I can
> see that it might cause problems with procurement and perhaps even when
> going to court.
>

Hmm.  Interesting point.  Maybe text reflect that information could be added
to the letter (as a footnote).   How does this work?...


"The identification of any company, organization and/or agency in this
letter, hereon referred to as an entity, that sponsors or uses software that
may been developed using C++Builder either in part and or in whole SHALL NOT
be misconstrued as an endorsement by that entity of any single product nor
used in a court law for settling contractual disputes or any other legal
issues with the said entity.  Merely the recognition of the application of a
product, namely C++Builder was used to either build or maintain critical
software or software elements for the said entity, and, therefore, that is
why they are identified.






If necessary I could also add.






"It should be noted that a significant number of companies, organizations
and agencies preferred to not be identified in this open letter, and,
therefore, their wishes were abided.  However, where appropriate, a general
description of the type of entity that sponsored or used software built
using C++Builder was identified as an alternative."






Let me know what you think?

> I can say that our software is used by:
>
>   * Many UK police forces
>   * Several UK and US government security agencies
>   * A number of customs units in Europe.
>

Thanks.  I used it.